In the news today, there's the story of an 83-year-old German woman who lived in San Francisco and was discovered to have been a guard at the Ravensbrueck concentration camp during World War II. Although she was not a member of the Nazi party, she worked with an SS-trained attack dog.
When federal officials found out about her past, the woman agreed to leave America and never return, give up her green card, and move back to Germany (because she lied on her immigration papers). Ironically, she married a German Jew after she came to America, who has since died. Relatives claim that her husband had no idea of his wife's past.
Such stories keep coming up of Nazis who have finally been tracked down and are now awaiting punishment. It's been sixty years since the end of World War II and these people are now senior citizens.
While in grad school, a story like this appeared in the news. I talked to my graduate advisor about it, who is Jewish and a Holocaust specialist. His response surprised me. He thought we should leave these people alone. What will we gain by forcing senior citizens to go on trial (and possibly go to prison) for something they did sixty years ago?
But then there's the other side of it. These people are guilty of participating in one of the worst crimes in human history. They can't just get away with it.
But did they get away with it or has their conscious and the fear of being caught for over sixty years been enough punishment?
It's hard to say. Where do you draw the line?
I've got a new home on the web - stop by if you get a chance! www.melissamarsh.net
I think we can all agree that 2016 was an incredibly difficult year. Too many things happened locally, nationally, and internationally: belo...
We have a big snowstorm headed our way. Now usually these snowstorm predictions tend to be far grander than what actually happens - i.e. we ...